On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 02/05/2013 05:37 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
n 02/05/2013 04:42 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
Use the compatible string in the device tree to determine which registers/functions to use in the HDMI driver. Also changes the references from v13 to 4210 and v14 to 4212 to reflect the IP block version instead of the HDMI version.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/exynos/hdmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/exynos/hdmi.txt
Binding looks sane to me.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c
#ifdef CONFIG_OF static struct of_device_id hdmi_match_types[] = { {
.compatible = "samsung,exynos5-hdmi",.data = (void *)HDMI_TYPE14,
.compatible = "samsung,exynos4-hdmi", }, { /* end node */ }Why not fill in all the "base" compatible values there (I think you need this anyway so that DTs don't all have to be compatible with samsung,exynos4-hdmi), with .data containing the HDMI_VER_EXYNOS* values, then ...
At the moment, all DTs have to be compatible with exynos4-hdmi since it provides the base for the current driver. The driver uses 4210 and 4212 to differentiate between different register addresses and features, but most things are just exynos4-hdmi compatible.
I would like to distinguish between 4210 and 4x12. since it has different features. e.g., HDMI v1.3 and v1.4. and I also want to use 4412 instead of 4212. there's no board to use 4212 at mainline until this time.
Thank you, Kyungmin Park
The DT nodes should include only the compatible values that the HW is actually compatible with. If the HW isn't compatible with exynos4-hdmi, that value shouldn't be in the compatible property, but instead whatever the "base" value that the HW really is compatible with. The driver can support multiple "base" compatible values from this table.
@@ -2218,17 +2217,18 @@ static int hdmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "samsung,exynos4210-hdmi"))hdata->version |= HDMI_VER_EXYNOS4210;if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "samsung,exynos4212-hdmi"))hdata->version |= HDMI_VER_EXYNOS4212;if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "samsung,exynos5250-hdmi"))hdata->version |= HDMI_VER_EXYNOS5250;Instead of that, do roughly:
match = of_match_device(hdmi_match_types, &pdev->dev); if (match) hdata->version |= (int)match->data;That way, it's all table-based. Any future additions to hdmi_match_types[] won't require another if statement to be added to probe().
I don't think it's that easy. of_match_device returns the first match from the device table, so I'd still need to iterate through the matches. I could still break this out into a table, but I don't think of_match_device is the right way to probe it.
You shouldn't have to iterate over multiple matches. of_match_device() is supposed to return the match for the first entry in the compatible property, then if there was no match, move on to looking at the next entry in the compatible property, etc. In practice, I think it's still not implemented quite correctly for this, but you can make it work by putting the newest compatible value first in the match table.
linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel