On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:02:59AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 29 November 2014 at 00:22, Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 02:30:45PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Hi Dave,
As discussed on irc here's the slightly late (because our QA cycle was a bit misaligned) final feature pull request for 3.19. I have a few fixes to sort out in my 3.20 queue, so will send you one more pull request next week with those. Then I'll hand over to Jani.
drm-intel-next-2014-11-21:
- infoframe tracking (for fastboot) from Jesse
- start of the dri1/ums support removal
- vlv forcewake timeout fixes (Imre)
- bunch of patches to polish the rps code (Imre) and improve it on bdw (Tom O'Rourke)
- on-demand pinning for execlist contexts
- vlv/chv backlight improvements (Ville)
- gen8+ render ctx w/a work from various people
- skl edp programming (Satheeshakrishna et al.)
- psr docbook (Rodrigo)
- piles of little fixes and improvements all over, as usual
Hey,
You got dirty in my tree
CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.o /home/airlied/devel/kernel/drm-next/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: In function ‘i915_dump_lrc’: /home/airlied/devel/kernel/drm-next/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:1805:26: warning: ignoring return value of ‘i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result] i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin(ctx_obj, ^ CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.o
more careful of dirty please.
send me a fix on top of that next tree, I'm not waiting 2 weeks for QA :-)
Oh dang I've totally forgotten about that one, it's been around for soo long :( Story is that while reviewing the fixup Chris&I realized that all the tricky but damn important differences between pin_pages/pin_obj and get_pages. And now the patches are somehow stuck in limbo (or at least I have no idea where exactly).
To make matters worse I've throw part of the dri1 removal on top so can't just revert because conflict galore. -Daniel