On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 05:43:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 04:47:31PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 10:40:29AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:10 AM Maxime Ripard maxime@cerno.tech wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:09:50PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 5:03 PM Maxime Ripard maxime@cerno.tech wrote:
Hi Sudip,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 10:08:19AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi All, >
<snip>
> > You can see the complete dmesg at > https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/76#step/dmesg/8
What test were you running?
Nothing particular, its just a boot test that we do every night after pulling from torvalds/linux.git
What are you booting to then?
I am not sure I understood the question. Its an Ubuntu image. The desktop environment is gnome. And as mentioned earlier, we use the HEAD of linus tree every night to boot the rpi4 and test that we can login via desktop environment and that there is no regression in dmesg.
Looking at the CI, this isn't from a RPi but from qemu?
What defconfig are you using? How did you generate the Ubuntu image? Through debootstrap? Any additional package?
So qemu (at least on Fedora 34) doesn't seem to have an RPI4 target, nor upstream: https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/079b1252e9de384385c9da910262312ec2e574c8/h...
I've tested an Ubuntu 21.04 arm64 build (since it seems like it's what you've been using), built using debootstrap + ubuntu-desktop, both with and without a monitor attached, and up to the desktop once logged in.
I don't see any crash.
That was with arm64's defconfig.
Maxime