26 Jun
2020
26 Jun
'20
12:05 p.m.
On Friday, June 26, 2020 11:15 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaalanen@gmail.com wrote:
I have no opinion really if adding yet another set of the same definitions is good or not. We do need the UAPI doc, but that does not necessarily mean we also need definition code in UAPI headers.
I give this one a shrug.
But then uapi docs don't document uapi, instead document internal kernel enums? And also user-space not using libdrm needs to have these hardcoded somewhere.
The libdrm re-definitions are annoying. Maybe a better way forward would be to have a "status" prop, which could then also be used for the planned fine-grained uapi events.