On 2016-01-08 01:20, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi guys,
Am I loosing the plot here or something feels amiss here ?
On 6 January 2016 at 06:12, Meng Yi meng.yi@nxp.com wrote:
For state->fb or state->crtc may be NULL in fsl_dcu_drm_plane_atomic_check function, if so, return 0.
Signed-off-by: Meng Yi meng.yi@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jianwei Wang jianwei.wang.chn@gmail.com
change in v2: -Add state->crtc check -return 0 when state->fb or state->crtc is NULL, instead of -EINVAL Adviced by Daniel Stone
drivers/gpu/drm/fsl-dcu/fsl_dcu_drm_plane.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/fsl-dcu/fsl_dcu_drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/fsl-dcu/fsl_dcu_drm_plane.c index 4b13cf9..8965580 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/fsl-dcu/fsl_dcu_drm_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/fsl-dcu/fsl_dcu_drm_plane.c @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ static int fsl_dcu_drm_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane, { struct drm_framebuffer *fb = state->fb;
if (!state->fb || !state->crtc)return 0;Namely: if we return success here core drm will end up calling the atomic_update...
After atomic_check atomic_disable could be called too. However, this seem not directly depend on state'>fb, but more on plane->state->crtc.
switch (fb->pixel_format) { case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565: case DRM_FORMAT_RGB888:@@ -85,9 +88,6 @@ static void fsl_dcu_drm_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane, unsigned int alpha, bpp; int index, ret;
if (!fb)return;... which no longer has the !fb check, and we'll crash with null deref a few lines below ?
If there is a legitimate situation where fb is null which also ultimately leads to a atomic_commit, I guess we should keep the return here...
-- Stefan