3 Jun
2012
3 Jun
'12
1:26 p.m.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:26 PM, bing deng deng8bing@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Why not modify "int ret;" to "int ret = 0;"? Below is the benefit: 1. return the constant 0 as wish. 2. The variable ret can be used if we want.
Why? ret is in vain and wastes memory...
--
Thanks,
//richard