On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:17:17PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com
MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index dd31933..476679c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/ F: include/drm/ F: include/uapi/drm/
+DRM MIPI DSI BUS +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff.
Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with Dave's ack?
FWIW, I've merged DSI changes through the panel tree in the past after discussing it with Dave on IRC. It seemed like a good fit and it was most relevant for panels anyway. Given that I had expected that Dave would give it a closer look before pulling than any of the vendor trees anyway, so it would be as good as an explicit Acked-by anyway.
Thierry