On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:07:32AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:46:22 +0200, Felipe Balbi balbi@ti.com wrote:
Drop the following headers_check errors: /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/drm_mode.h:85: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h> /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/i915_drm.h:120: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h> /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/mga_drm.h:260: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h> /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/radeon_drm.h:758: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h> /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/via_drm.h:117: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
Cc: David Airlie airlied@linux.ie Cc: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi balbi@ti.com
include/drm/drm_mode.h | 2 ++ include/drm/i915_drm.h | 1 + include/drm/mga_drm.h | 1 + include/drm/radeon_drm.h | 1 + include/drm/via_drm.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mode.h b/include/drm/drm_mode.h index 0fc7397..1678d7b 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_mode.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_mode.h @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ #ifndef _DRM_MODE_H #define _DRM_MODE_H
+#include <linux/types.h>
Would
#if 0 #include <linux/types.h> /* silence make header_check */ #endif
be an acceptable compromise?
Why would you want to do that ? I truly have those types in use. headers_check seems to be reporting correctly.