5 Nov
2010
5 Nov
'10
7:14 a.m.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Pavel Machek pavel@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ static struct drm_driver driver = {
static int __init i810_init(void) {
- if (num_present_cpus() > 1) {
- pr_err("drm/i810 does not support SMP\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
driver.num_ioctls = i810_max_ioctl; return drm_init(&driver);
Umm, and now someone onlines second cpu?
Well, I see it's being fixed in a different way but yeah, num_possible_cpus() would be more appropriate here.
(trimming Cc list again)
I thought that patch was still current, what other way are we fixing it now?
Oh, I just read the thread wrong. If you repost with num_possible_cpus, feel free to add my ACK.