23 Aug
2016
23 Aug
'16
9:41 a.m.
Hi,
On 22 August 2016 at 16:23, Rob Clark robdclark@gmail.com wrote:
I guess a lot comes down to 'how long before hw designers bolt a CP to the thing'.. at that point, I think you especially don't want a per-blit kernel interface.
Regardless of whether or not we want it, we already _have_ it, in the form of V4L2 M2M. There are already a few IP blocks working on that, I believe. If V4L2 <-> KMS interop is painful, well, we need to fix that anyway ...
Cheers, Daniel