Comment # 6 on bug 82717 from Tom Stellard

(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> 
> Thanks, they fixed it upstream:
> https://code.google.com/p/mandelbulber/source/detail?r=451
> 
> That went quicker than I thought.
> 
> "Only" OpenCL 1.2 is missing then I guess.

Does it require any other OpenCL 1.2 features besides the static keyword on
functions?  If not then they should just drop the keyword when using a 1.1
implementation.

Have all the issues with this program been fixed?