On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 02:41:58PM +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote:
@@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_destroy(struct drm_crtc *crtc) mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_destroy(&mtk_crtc->cmdq_handle);
if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan) {
mbox_free_channel(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan); mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan = NULL; }device_link_remove(mtk_crtc->drm_dev, mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan->mbox->dev);
[...]
@@ -956,6 +959,16 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, }
if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan) {
struct device_link *link;
/* add devlink to cmdq dev to make sure suspend/resume order is correct */
link = device_link_add(dev, mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan->mbox->dev,
DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
if (!link) {
dev_err(dev, "Unable to link dev=%s\n",
dev_name(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan->mbox->dev));
}
If device_link_add() failed, doesn't mtk_drm_crtc_create() need to return an error and exit?
OTOH, if device_link_add() failed, won't it bring any side effects to call device_link_remove()?