On 14/04/2021 10:06, Robert Foss wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 08:13, Neil Armstrong narmstrong@baylibre.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
Le 13/04/2021 à 22:21, Robert Foss a écrit :
Hey Neil & Phong,
Thanks for submitting this series!
+static const struct drm_bridge_funcs it66121_bridge_funcs = {
.attach = it66121_bridge_attach,
.enable = it66121_bridge_enable,
.disable = it66121_bridge_disable,
.mode_set = it66121_bridge_mode_set,
.mode_valid = it66121_bridge_mode_valid,
.detect = it66121_bridge_detect,
.get_edid = it66121_bridge_get_edid,
.atomic_get_output_bus_fmts = it66121_bridge_atomic_get_output_bus_fmts,
.atomic_get_input_bus_fmts = it66121_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts,
+};
I would like to see an implementation of HPD, since it is supported by the hardware[1] (and required by the documentation). IRQ status bit 0 seems to be the responsible for notifying us about hot plug detection events.
It's implemented in the IRQ handler with the IT66121_INT_STATUS1_HPD_STATUS event.
I didn't even get that far :)
Either way, the HPD support should be exposed in drm_bridge_funcs (.hpd_enable, .hpd_disable (and possibly .hpd_notify)) and drm_bridge.ops (DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD).
Indeed I forgot these calls in the NO_CONNECTOR implementation...
Neil