On 2018.08.03 08:41:19 +0800, Yi Wang wrote:
The 'sparse' variable may leak when return in function intel_vgpu_ioctl(), and this patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang wang.yi59@zte.com.cn Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c index df4e4a0..6a6f199 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c @@ -1200,6 +1200,7 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd, return ret; break; default:
kfree(sparse); return -EINVAL; } }
@@ -1215,6 +1216,7 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd, sizeof(info), caps.buf, caps.size)) { kfree(caps.buf);
kfree(sparse); return -EFAULT; } info.cap_offset = sizeof(info);
@@ -1223,6 +1225,7 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd, kfree(caps.buf); }
kfree(sparse);
Unfortunately this would cause a double-free error in normal path, as we tried to free sparse after use to add caps. So may be better to fix free in error path and move normal free of sparse in final point, e.g
Yeah, that's right! Thanks a lot for your advice. I will send a v2 patch.
--- Best wishes Yi Wang