18 Oct
2011
18 Oct
'11
12:06 a.m.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 20:41, Keith Packard keithp@keithp.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:07:51 -0200, Eugeni Dodonov eugeni@dodonov.net wrote:
From what I've checked, the other return error value in this context
could
be -EREMOTEIO, which could be caused by transmission error so it should
be
retried.
Oh, there's -ENOMEM, -EINVAL and probably a few others down in the bowels of the kernel i2c bits. Starting with the obvious (ENXIO) seems safest to me.
Yes, of course, but I was referring to the values which could be returned through the i2c-algo-bit call used in this edid detection call.
--
Eugeni Dodonov
http://eugeni.dodonov.net/