Hello Krzysztof,
On 12/07/2015 09:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 08.12.2015 00:36, Inki Dae wrote:
Hi Javier,
2015-12-07 22:41 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas javier@osg.samsung.com:
Hello Inki,
On 12/07/2015 09:52 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
From: Javier Martinez Canillas javier@osg.samsung.com
Thanks a lot for posting this patch.
The DT binding for the Exynos DRM Display Port (DP) driver isn't consistent since it uses a phandle to describe the connection between the DP port and the display panel but uses the OF graph ports and endpoints to describe the connection betwen the DP port, a bridge chip and the panel.
The Exynos DP driver and the DT binding have been changed to allow also to describe the DP port to panel connection using ports / endpoints (OF graph) so this patch changes the Exynos5800 Peach Pi DT to make it consistent with the Exynos5420 Peach Pit that has a eDP to LVDS chip and uses OF graph too.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javier@osg.samsung.com Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javier@osg.samsung.com
This tag was not in my original patch, it's true that I tested it but will someone believe me? ;)
Oops. I confused you spread Reviewed-by and Tested-by here and there. Don't worry about that. Will remove it if you don't give me Tested-by. :)
Actually authorship (the "From") in this case means Tested-by. Author always tests the patch so it would look weird if we start adding tested-by to our own patches, right?
Exactly, that's what I tried to say. It's implied that the author tested her/his own patch in the best possible way.
Dear Inki, However the patch misses your SoB. You touched and sent it so please extend the SoB chain-of-blame.
Right, I missed that.
Best regards, Krzysztof
Best regards,