On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:23:33 -0400 Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com wrote:
Note also that the generic DRM KMS code assumes cursor support at 64x64, and there's no generic way for a driver at present (that I know of) to inform it of anything different.
It shouldn't be too hard to add a new cap for querying the cursor size to the drm cap interface.
There was already a patch request for that, but the functions were surely useless.
Otherwise, you may do a search on "largest cursor:" (xdpyinfo output). The results are surprising..