svm_bo eviction mechanism is different from regular BOs. Every SVM_BO created contains one eviction fence and one worker item for eviction process. SVM_BOs can be attached to one or more pranges. For SVM_BO eviction mechanism, TTM will start to call enable_signal callback for every SVM_BO until VRAM space is available. Here, all the ttm_evict calls are synchronous, this guarantees that each eviction has completed and the fence has signaled before it returns.
Signed-off-by: Alex Sierra alex.sierra@amd.com Signed-off-by: Philip Yang Philip.Yang@amd.com Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling Felix.Kuehling@amd.com Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling Felix.Kuehling@amd.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.h | 13 +- 2 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c index d89c998f9aa4..6d3add17fcac 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#define AMDGPU_SVM_RANGE_RESTORE_DELAY_MS 1
+static void svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker(struct work_struct *work); static bool svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables(struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni, const struct mmu_notifier_range *range, @@ -320,7 +321,15 @@ static void svm_range_bo_release(struct kref *kref) spin_lock(&svm_bo->list_lock); } spin_unlock(&svm_bo->list_lock); - + if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(&svm_bo->eviction_fence->base)) { + /* We're not in the eviction worker. + * Signal the fence and synchronize with any + * pending eviction work. + */ + dma_fence_signal(&svm_bo->eviction_fence->base); + cancel_work_sync(&svm_bo->eviction_work); + } + dma_fence_put(&svm_bo->eviction_fence->base); amdgpu_bo_unref(&svm_bo->bo); kfree(svm_bo); } @@ -333,6 +342,61 @@ static void svm_range_bo_unref(struct svm_range_bo *svm_bo) kref_put(&svm_bo->kref, svm_range_bo_release); }
+static bool svm_range_validate_svm_bo(struct svm_range *prange) +{ + mutex_lock(&prange->lock); + if (!prange->svm_bo) { + mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); + return false; + } + if (prange->ttm_res) { + /* We still have a reference, all is well */ + mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); + return true; + } + if (svm_bo_ref_unless_zero(prange->svm_bo)) { + if (READ_ONCE(prange->svm_bo->evicting)) { + struct dma_fence *f; + struct svm_range_bo *svm_bo; + /* The BO is getting evicted, + * we need to get a new one + */ + mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); + svm_bo = prange->svm_bo; + f = dma_fence_get(&svm_bo->eviction_fence->base); + svm_range_bo_unref(prange->svm_bo); + /* wait for the fence to avoid long spin-loop + * at list_empty_careful + */ + dma_fence_wait(f, false); + dma_fence_put(f); + } else { + /* The BO was still around and we got + * a new reference to it + */ + mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); + pr_debug("reuse old bo svms 0x%p [0x%lx 0x%lx]\n", + prange->svms, prange->start, prange->last); + + prange->ttm_res = &prange->svm_bo->bo->tbo.mem; + return true; + } + + } else { + mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); + } + + /* We need a new svm_bo. Spin-loop to wait for concurrent + * svm_range_bo_release to finish removing this range from + * its range list. After this, it is safe to reuse the + * svm_bo pointer and svm_bo_list head. + */ + while (!list_empty_careful(&prange->svm_bo_list)) + ; + + return false; +} + static struct svm_range_bo *svm_range_bo_new(void) { struct svm_range_bo *svm_bo; @@ -352,72 +416,56 @@ int svm_range_vram_node_new(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct svm_range *prange, bool clear) { - struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info; struct amdgpu_bo_param bp; struct svm_range_bo *svm_bo; struct amdgpu_bo_user *ubo; struct amdgpu_bo *bo; struct kfd_process *p; + struct mm_struct *mm; int r;
- pr_debug("[0x%lx 0x%lx]\n", prange->start, prange->last); - mutex_lock(&prange->lock); - if (prange->svm_bo) { - if (prange->ttm_res) { - /* We still have a reference, all is well */ - mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); - return 0; - } - if (svm_bo_ref_unless_zero(prange->svm_bo)) { - /* The BO was still around and we got - * a new reference to it - */ - mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); - pr_debug("reuse old bo [0x%lx 0x%lx]\n", - prange->start, prange->last); - - prange->ttm_res = &prange->svm_bo->bo->tbo.mem; - return 0; - } - - mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); - - /* We need a new svm_bo. Spin-loop to wait for concurrent - * svm_range_bo_release to finish removing this range from - * its range list. After this, it is safe to reuse the - * svm_bo pointer and svm_bo_list head. - */ - while (!list_empty_careful(&prange->svm_bo_list)) - ; + p = container_of(prange->svms, struct kfd_process, svms); + pr_debug("pasid: %x svms 0x%p [0x%lx 0x%lx]\n", p->pasid, prange->svms, + prange->start, prange->last);
- } else { - mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); - } + if (svm_range_validate_svm_bo(prange)) + return 0;
svm_bo = svm_range_bo_new(); if (!svm_bo) { pr_debug("failed to alloc svm bo\n"); return -ENOMEM; } - + mm = get_task_mm(p->lead_thread); + if (!mm) { + pr_debug("failed to get mm\n"); + kfree(svm_bo); + return -ESRCH; + } + svm_bo->svms = prange->svms; + svm_bo->eviction_fence = + amdgpu_amdkfd_fence_create(dma_fence_context_alloc(1), + mm, + svm_bo); + mmput(mm); + INIT_WORK(&svm_bo->eviction_work, svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker); + svm_bo->evicting = 0; memset(&bp, 0, sizeof(bp)); bp.size = prange->npages * PAGE_SIZE; bp.byte_align = PAGE_SIZE; bp.domain = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM; bp.flags = AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_NO_CPU_ACCESS; bp.flags |= clear ? AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CLEARED : 0; + bp.flags |= AMDGPU_AMDKFD_CREATE_SVM_BO; bp.type = ttm_bo_type_device; bp.resv = NULL;
r = amdgpu_bo_create_user(adev, &bp, &ubo); if (r) { pr_debug("failed %d to create bo\n", r); - kfree(svm_bo); - return r; + goto create_bo_failed; } bo = &ubo->bo; - - p = container_of(prange->svms, struct kfd_process, svms); r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(bo, true); if (r) { pr_debug("failed %d to reserve bo\n", r); @@ -430,8 +478,7 @@ svm_range_vram_node_new(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct svm_range *prange, amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo); goto reserve_bo_failed; } - process_info = p->kgd_process_info; - amdgpu_bo_fence(bo, &process_info->eviction_fence->base, true); + amdgpu_bo_fence(bo, &svm_bo->eviction_fence->base, true);
amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo);
@@ -447,8 +494,10 @@ svm_range_vram_node_new(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct svm_range *prange, return 0;
reserve_bo_failed: - kfree(svm_bo); amdgpu_bo_unref(&bo); +create_bo_failed: + dma_fence_put(&svm_bo->eviction_fence->base); + kfree(svm_bo); prange->ttm_res = NULL;
return r; @@ -2329,6 +2378,74 @@ svm_range_trigger_migration(struct mm_struct *mm, struct svm_range *prange, return r; }
+int svm_range_schedule_evict_svm_bo(struct amdgpu_amdkfd_fence *fence) +{ + if (!fence) + return -EINVAL; + + if (dma_fence_is_signaled(&fence->base)) + return 0; + + if (fence->svm_bo) { + WRITE_ONCE(fence->svm_bo->evicting, 1); + schedule_work(&fence->svm_bo->eviction_work); + } + + return 0; +} + +static void svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct svm_range_bo *svm_bo; + struct kfd_process *p; + struct mm_struct *mm; + + svm_bo = container_of(work, struct svm_range_bo, eviction_work); + if (!svm_bo_ref_unless_zero(svm_bo)) + return; /* svm_bo was freed while eviction was pending */ + + /* svm_range_bo_release destroys this worker thread. So during + * the lifetime of this thread, kfd_process and mm will be valid. + */ + p = container_of(svm_bo->svms, struct kfd_process, svms); + mm = p->mm; + if (!mm) + return; + + mmap_read_lock(mm); + spin_lock(&svm_bo->list_lock); + while (!list_empty(&svm_bo->range_list)) { + struct svm_range *prange = + list_first_entry(&svm_bo->range_list, + struct svm_range, svm_bo_list); + list_del_init(&prange->svm_bo_list); + spin_unlock(&svm_bo->list_lock); + + pr_debug("svms 0x%p [0x%lx 0x%lx]\n", prange->svms, + prange->start, prange->last); + + mutex_lock(&prange->migrate_mutex); + svm_migrate_vram_to_ram(prange, svm_bo->eviction_fence->mm); + + mutex_lock(&prange->lock); + prange->svm_bo = NULL; + mutex_unlock(&prange->lock); + + mutex_unlock(&prange->migrate_mutex); + + spin_lock(&svm_bo->list_lock); + } + spin_unlock(&svm_bo->list_lock); + mmap_read_unlock(mm); + + dma_fence_signal(&svm_bo->eviction_fence->base); + /* This is the last reference to svm_bo, after svm_range_vram_node_free + * has been called in svm_migrate_vram_to_ram + */ + WARN_ONCE(kref_read(&svm_bo->kref) != 1, "This was not the last reference\n"); + svm_range_bo_unref(svm_bo); +} + static int svm_range_set_attr(struct kfd_process *p, uint64_t start, uint64_t size, uint32_t nattr, struct kfd_ioctl_svm_attribute *attrs) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.h index 9a078d354cba..11b04a706ff9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.h @@ -34,10 +34,14 @@ #include "kfd_priv.h"
struct svm_range_bo { - struct amdgpu_bo *bo; - struct kref kref; - struct list_head range_list; /* all svm ranges shared this bo */ - spinlock_t list_lock; + struct amdgpu_bo *bo; + struct kref kref; + struct list_head range_list; /* all svm ranges shared this bo */ + spinlock_t list_lock; + struct amdgpu_amdkfd_fence *eviction_fence; + struct work_struct eviction_work; + struct svm_range_list *svms; + uint32_t evicting; };
enum svm_work_list_ops { @@ -157,6 +161,7 @@ int svm_range_split_by_granularity(struct kfd_process *p, struct mm_struct *mm, struct svm_range *prange); int svm_range_restore_pages(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned int pasid, uint64_t addr); +int svm_range_schedule_evict_svm_bo(struct amdgpu_amdkfd_fence *fence); void svm_range_add_list_work(struct svm_range_list *svms, struct svm_range *prange, struct mm_struct *mm, enum svm_work_list_ops op);