Hi Randy,
Yes, RETURNS: will work. It just looks like any kernel-doc section name, such as Context: or Note:. However, the documented format for return info is "Return:". (see Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst)
Thanks for the note. I asked for RETURNS: because the rest of the file appears to be using it. Returns: is certainly the better alternative. I didn't know there was a difference.
Best regards Thomas
I'm not insisting on using Return: It can stay the same as the rest of the file IMO.
fb_notify.c contains only the three functions modified in this patch.
So it is consistent within this file, but other fbdev/core/ files uses RETURNS. git grep shows 5 hits only.
So we will stick with the documented practice here.
Sam