On Thursday, May 03, 2018 02:24 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Daniel Mack daniel@zonque.org wrote:
This regression stems from 0e08270a1f01 ("drm/msm: Separate locking of buffer resources from struct_mutex").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack daniel@zonque.org Cc: Sushmita Susheelendra ssusheel@codeaurora.org Cc: Rob Clark rclark@redhat.com Fixes: 0e08270a1f01 ("drm/msm: Separate locking of buffer resources from struct_mutex")
I'm resending these two patches as I got no reply last time.
I've applied these two to msm-next. Sorry I missed them before... for some reason they don't seem to show up in the dri-devel patchworks[1]
No problem, and thanks for applying them :)
Daniel
BR, -R
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/dri-devel/series/
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c index 0f7324a686ca..27637d8a99ff 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c @@ -994,7 +994,6 @@ static int dsi_tx_buf_alloc(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, int size)
ret = msm_gem_get_iova(msm_host->tx_gem_obj, priv->kms->aspace, &iova);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); if (ret) { pr_err("%s: failed to get iova, %d\n", __func__, ret); return ret;-- 2.14.3