On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch wrote:
This has the nice advantage that we'll get rid of a DRM_WAIT_ON user for free.
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com Cc: Alan Cox alan@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_irq.c | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_irq.c index a9bb34704738..f883f9e4c524 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_irq.c @@ -450,21 +450,6 @@ int psb_irq_disable_dpst(struct drm_device *dev) return 0; }
-#ifdef PSB_FIXME -static int psb_vblank_do_wait(struct drm_device *dev,
unsigned int *sequence, atomic_t *counter)-{
unsigned int cur_vblank;int ret = 0;DRM_WAIT_ON(ret, dev->vblank.queue, 3 * HZ,(((cur_vblank = atomic_read(counter))- *sequence) <= (1 << 23)));*sequence = cur_vblank;return ret;-} -#endif
/*
- It is used to enable VBLANK interrupt
*/
1.8.4.3
Yes, that can just go away. Thanks.
Acked-by: Patrik Jakobsson patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com