29 Nov
2017
29 Nov
'17
8:52 p.m.
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Brian Norris briannorris@chromium.org wrote:
From: Nickey Yang nickey.yang@rock-chips.com
We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs /#{addres,size}-cells.
v4:
- keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port@0' nodes
- separate from the rest of the series, since this is mostly independent of the driver refactoring
Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang nickey.yang@rock-chips.com Signed-off-by: Brian Norris briannorris@chromium.org
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This seems sane to me according to my current understanding and reading of the bindings.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson dianders@chromium.org