Hi Alexander,
thanks for trying to fix this, yet I have some doubts.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
Rationale: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20200626110706.7b5d4a38@lwn.net/
I think we need some text here. Clicking on a link to understand what a patch is about is not comfortable. You can add the link with a Link: tag for additional information.
Removing stale email addresses may have some value, but removing...
Compaq's Bootldr + John Dorsey's patch for Assabet support -(http://www.handhelds.org/Compaq/bootldr.html)
... information like this is not good. 'Wayback machine' still has copies in case someone wants to look at where the infos came from.
- Copyright 2004-2005 Phil Blundell pb@handhelds.org
- Copyright 2004-2005 Phil Blundell
This is an OK case in my book...
-MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Blundell pb@handhelds.org"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Blundell");
... same here ...
@@ -435,7 +435,6 @@ case a PCI bridge (DEC chip 21152). The value of 'pb' is now only initialized if a de4x5 chip is present.
<france@handhelds.org>
This is kind of a signature and should be kept IMO.
- 2001/07/23: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
- Hand merge version from handhelds.org CVS tree. See patch
- Hand merge version from CVS tree. See patch
That information may be useful.
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ /* -*- linux-c -*-
- (C) 2003 zecke@handhelds.org
Removing copyright is a bad idea.
Probably some comment blocks are cruft meanwhile and can be removed as a whole. That can be discussed. But removing only the handhelds.org part makes most parts worse IMHO.
Thanks and happy hacking,
Wolfram