Hi Heiko,
On 11/27/2015 09:32 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015, 16:56:01 schrieb Yakir Yang:
There are some IP limit on rk3288 that only support 4 physical lanes of 2.7/1.6 Gbps/lane, so seprate them out by device_type flag.
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javier@osg.samsung.com Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang ykk@rock-chips.com
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c index 6307060..563ffb1d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c @@ -890,8 +890,8 @@ static void analogix_dp_commit(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) return; }
- ret = analogix_dp_set_link_train(dp, dp->video_info.lane_count,
dp->video_info.link_rate);
- ret = analogix_dp_set_link_train(dp, dp->video_info.max_lane_count,
if (ret) { dev_err(dp->dev, "unable to do link train\n"); return;dp->video_info.max_link_rate);
@@ -1156,16 +1156,25 @@ static int analogix_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) struct device_node *dp_node = dp->dev->of_node; struct video_info *video_info = &dp->video_info;
- if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,link-rate",
&video_info->link_rate)) {
dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get link-rate\n");
return -EINVAL;
- }
- if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,lane-count",
&video_info->lane_count)) {
dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get lane-count\n");
return -EINVAL;
- switch (dp->plat_data && dp->plat_data->dev_type) {
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c: In function ‘analogix_dp_dt_parse_pdata’: drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c:1191:10: warning: switch condition has boolean value [-Wswitch-bool] switch (dp->plat_data && dp->plat_data->dev_type) { ^
As I think we always will need to distinguish between implementations, I guess it should be safe to exit with an error, it that implementation-data is not available, like just doing before the switch a:
if (!dp->plat_data) return -EINVAL;
Done, thanks
- Yakir
Heiko