On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:50:33PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi Dave,
Sorry for the dupe, sending with the list in Cc this time.
The following changes since commit f114040e3ea6e07372334ade75d1ee0775c355e1:
Linux 3.18-rc1 (2014-10-19 18:08:38 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~tagr/linux tags/drm/fixes/for-3.19-rc1
for you to fetch changes up to 37d74578d819b1798dd2cff724438e345d118980:
video/hdmi: Relicense header under MIT license (2014-11-13 10:44:42 +0100)
Thanks, Thierry
drm: Miscellaneous fixes for v3.19-rc1
This is a small collection of fixes that I've been carrying around for a while now. Many of these have been posted and reviewed or acked. The few that haven't I deemed too trivial to bother.
Thierry Reding (8): drm: Use size_t for blob property sizes drm: Use const data when creating blob properties drm/gem: Fix typo in kerneldoc drm/prime: Use unsigned type for number of pages drm: Implement drm_get_pci_dev() dummy for !PCI drm: Make drm_mode_create_tv_properties() signature consistent drm/gma500: mdfld: Reuse video/mipi_display.h video/hdmi: Relicense header under MIT license
Obligatory process bikeshed: Most of these patches doen't seem to have shown up on dri-devel nor gotten review. Yeah it's just simple stuff here but imo we have a well-working review culture around in the drm community, so reposting the entire pile and pinging the usual suspects on #dri-devel isn't a lot of fuzz really.
In my opinion doing the review dance even for simple stuff is a great way to build up a working review culture - barriers are much lower for newbies to do a bit of review if the patch is fairly trivial. And for drm features written by Intel folks I try hard to get review or at least feedback from non-Intel people here. Of course that should go both ways and I'd be happy to chase down people from my team to do some review when needed.
Cheers, Daniel