On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:28:37 -0400 Harry Wentland harry.wentland@amd.com wrote:
On 2021-09-22 04:31, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:05:05 -0400 Harry Wentland harry.wentland@amd.com wrote:
On 2021-09-21 09:31, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 20:14:50 -0400 Harry Wentland harry.wentland@amd.com wrote:
...
Did anybody start any CM doc patches in Weston or Wayland yet?
There is the https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/swick/wayland-protocols/-/blob/color/unstable... we started a long time ago, and have not really touched it for a while. Since we last touched it, at least my understanding has developed somewhat.
It is linked from the overview in https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/14 and if you want to propose changes, the way to do it is file a MR in https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/swick/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests against the 'color' branch. Patches very much welcome, that doc does not need to limit itself to Wayland. :-)
Right, I've read all that a while back.
It might be a good place to consolidate most of the Linux CM/HDR discussion, since gitlab is good with allowing discussions, we can track changes, and it's more formatting and diagram friendly than text-only email.
Fine by me, but the way things are right now, we'd be hijacking Sebastian's personal repository for these things. That's not ideal.
We can't merge the protocol XML into wayland-protocols until it has the accepted implementations required by the governance rules, but I wonder if we could land color.rst ahead of time, then work on that in wayland-protocols upstream repo.
It's hard to pick a good place for a cross-project document. Any other ideas?
We also have issues tracked at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/swick/wayland-protocols/-/issues?scope=all&am...
Thanks, pq