On 2018-06-01 03:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Michel Dänzer michel@daenzer.net wrote:
On 2018-06-01 02:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Michel Dänzer michel@daenzer.net wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daenzer@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer michel.daenzer@amd.com
Series is: Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com
Thanks. Is it okay to merge all of these via the amdgpu tree, or should I wait for an ack from Jon and/or core DRM maintainers for that?
GPU documentation usually goes through the drm trees. You might want to push patch 1 (drm_mm.rst fix) via drm_misc, but the rest are can go in via the amdgpu tree since they are amdgpu specific.
I'd prefer merging all three patches together, since without patch 1, patch 3 generates the warning below while generating documentation, and the reference to the PRIME Buffer Sharing section doesn't work.
.../linux/Documentation/gpu/amdgpu.rst:2: WARNING: undefined label: prime_buffer_sharing (if the link has no caption the label must precede a section header)