3 Sep
2019
3 Sep
'19
7:36 a.m.
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Cleanest would be a new header I guess, together with might_sleep(). But moving that is a bit much I think, there's almost 500 callers of that one from a quick git grep
If dropping do while is the only change then I can edit it in.. I think we have the acks now
Yeah sounds simplest, thanks.
Hi Jason,
Do you expect me to resend now, or do you plan to do the patchwork appeasement when applying? I've seen you merged the other patches (thanks!), but not these two here.
Sorry, I didn't get to this before I started travelling, and deferred it since we were having linux-next related problems with hmm.git. I hope to do it today.
I will fix it up as promised
Thanks, Jason