On 30.04.2012 17:12, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jerome Glissej.glisse@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Christian König deathsimple@vodafone.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
if nobody has a last moment concern please include the following patches in drm-next.
Except for some minor fixes they have already been on the list for quite some time, but I intentional left out the debugfs related patches cause we haven't finished the discussion about them yet.
If you prefer to merge them directly, I also made them available as reset-rework branch here: git://people.freedesktop.org/~deathsimple/linux
Cheers, Christian.
I am not completely ok, i am against patch 5. I need sometime to review it.
Cheers, Jerome
Sorr mean patch 7
I just started to wonder :) what's wrong with patch 7?
Please keep in mind that implementing proper locking in the lower level objects allows us to remove quite some locking in the upper layers.
By the way, do you mind when I dig into the whole locking stuff of the kernel driver a bit more? There seems to be allot of possibilities to cleanup and simplify the overall driver.
Cheers, Christian.