On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Borislav Petkov bp@alien8.de wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:21:21AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
I'm assuming you didn't also update your userspace gfx stack?
By that you mean x.org etc, right? Or GPU microcode too? In any case, I haven't touched any of those deliberately, AFAICR at least.
Right. Xorg drivers or mesa drivers.
Does disabling the new DMA ring for ttm bo moves avoid the issue?
How do I do that?
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c index 9056faf..b0cc46d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c @@ -974,8 +974,8 @@ static struct radeon_asic r600_asic = { .blit_ring_index = RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX, .dma = &r600_copy_dma, .dma_ring_index = R600_RING_TYPE_DMA_INDEX, - .copy = &r600_copy_dma, - .copy_ring_index = R600_RING_TYPE_DMA_INDEX, + .copy = &r600_copy_blit, + .copy_ring_index = RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX, }, .surface = { .set_reg = r600_set_surface_reg, @@ -1058,8 +1058,8 @@ static struct radeon_asic rs780_asic = { .blit_ring_index = RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX, .dma = &r600_copy_dma, .dma_ring_index = R600_RING_TYPE_DMA_INDEX, - .copy = &r600_copy_dma, - .copy_ring_index = R600_RING_TYPE_DMA_INDEX, + .copy = &r600_copy_blit, + .copy_ring_index = RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX, }, .surface = { .set_reg = r600_set_surface_reg,
Thanks.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.