30 Jun
2014
30 Jun
'14
1:22 p.m.
On 06/30/2014 03:18 PM, Christopher Friedt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Christopher Friedt chrisfriedt@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds a bit more accurate. Should kms and fbdev be setting both registers then?
I wonder if fbdev can use PITCHLOCK as well, rather than BYTES_PER_LINE. I will only be able to run both kms and fbdev functional tests about 9 hours from now, so any discussion until then is welcome
Please see the previous message I sent. If you just remove the line that sets BYTES_PER_LINE, fbdev will have called into the kms code to set PITCHLOCK correctly.
/Thomas