On 08/11/2019 13:10, Emil Velikov wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 13:34, Steven Price steven.price@arm.com wrote:
On 01/11/2019 13:03, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov emil.velikov@collabora.com
As of earlier commit we have address space separation. Yet we forgot to remove the respective comment and DRM_AUTH in the ioctl declaration.
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com Cc: David Airlie airlied@linux.ie Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch Cc: Robin Murphy robin.murphy@arm.com Cc: Steven Price steven.price@arm.com Fixes: 7282f7645d06 ("drm/panfrost: Implement per FD address spaces") Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov emil.velikov@collabora.com
Reviewed-by: Steven Price steven.price@arm.com
I'm not sure DRM_AUTH provided us with much in the first place (because render nodes could snoop/affect the primary node), but since we have address space separation it's clearly not required now.
Thanks Steve. This is exactly the reason why I removed it from most other drivers. There are equivalent vmwgfx changes and a DRM core patch in this series.
Do you think you'll have some time to check those over? Would be amazing if I can apply the lot in one go to drm-misc.
I'm afraid I don't know enough about the security model of vmwgfx to meaningfully comment on those changes. On the surface they look fine, but it really needs someone who understands whether this exposes an attack surface.
The DRM core patch concerns me slightly (although again I'm not completely up to speed on the security mode here). For a device which doesn't have address space separation (and doesn't support render nodes), is there anything stopping a process which hasn't authenticated converting another process's handle to a prime fd? (or injecting dmabufs into the address space used by the authenticated process - which might cause address space exhaustion). If that's not a concern then I'm not sure why the ioctls were originally added with DRM_AUTH...
Steve