Re: [PATCH] drm/ssd130x: Make ssd130x_remove() return void

Hello Uwe,

Thanks for your patch.

On 4/25/22 21:23, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

This function returns zero unconditionally, so there isn't any benefit of returning a value. Make it return void to be able to see at a glance that the return value of ssd130x_i2c_remove() is always zero.

This patch is a preparation for making i2c remove callbacks return void.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de

Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javierm@redhat.com

and I'll push to drm-misc (drm-misc-next) now.