Em Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:49:23 +0200 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch escreveu:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:53:15PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
This series actually folds the previous Sphinx 3.x patch series with the other patches I sent fixing warnings with Sphinx 2.x and with kernel-doc and that weren't merged yet via some other tree.
It is based on the top of upstream, plus the media pull request I sent yesterday:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201012134139.0d58f5d7@coco.lan/My plan is to send a pull request with those patches after Thursday's linux next release.
On this series, I removed the patches that depend on material currently found only at linux-next.
Was a bit tricky to find the cover letter here and that you plan to send these out this merge window.
Sorry for that. As this series touch lots of subsystems, just c/c the maintainers mean more than 50 c/c to patch 00. Some e-mail servers may not accept e-mails with too many c/c people.
Yet, checking at the c/c list of the original patch, you were copied on patch 00/80. So, maybe the e-mail server had silently dropped the original e-mail.
I think we'll have some confusion now with Alex from amd having picked up a few already.
I ended moving (at least part of) the drm patches from this series into a second one, as I'm intending to submit most of those patches today or tomorrow, and the remaining ones by the end of the merge window.
Anyway Acked-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch for the remaining drm patches.
Thank you!
Although I can also pick them up to drm-misc-next (but that's going to be 5.11 or so).
It would be a way better to have them merged for 5.10, in order to have a clean html build there.
Thanks, Mauro