Hi Maxime,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 09:48:43AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 03:02:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:42:28AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
of_graph_get_port_by_id doesn't modify the device_node pointer it takes as argument, so we can make it const.
From a C point of view that's right, but conceptually speaking, is it right to return a non-const child port node of a const device_node ?
I mean, I guess not, but you're the one that asked for it: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/YBAiztjg0Jji9voK@pendragon.ideasonboard.co...
Oops. Looks like I must be wrong with at least one of the two comments. Please pick the option you like best.
I can change it if you want, but certainly not if the only comment I get on this series for the next year is going to be over whether or not arguments of functions unrelated to the main intent should be constified or not.
DRM/KMS seems to suffer from a deficit of reviewers in all non-desktop areas :-(