Am 03.04.2013 16:42, schrieb Jerome Glisse:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:18:30AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsimple@vodafone.de
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c index 70d3824..7d66e01 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c @@ -241,15 +241,15 @@ int radeon_cs_parser_init(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, void *data) return -EINVAL; }
if (radeon_cs_get_ring(p, ring, priority))return -EINVAL;- /* we only support VM on SI+ */
if ((p->rdev->family >= CHIP_TAHITI) &&((p->cs_flags & RADEON_CS_USE_VM) == 0)) {
if ((p->rdev->asic->ring[p->ring].cs_parse == NULL) &&((p->cs_flags & RADEON_CS_USE_VM) == 0)) { DRM_ERROR("VM required on SI+!\n"); return -EINVAL;What about updating the error message to something more appropriate like ring %d require virtual memory
Good point, going to change it.
Christian.
Cheers, Jerome
}
if (radeon_cs_get_ring(p, ring, priority))return -EINVAL;}
/* deal with non-vm */
-- 1.7.9.5
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel