A single error message should be sufficient to inform about the detection of an unknown GCT revision at the end. Thus return after the logging call in this case directly.
Did you test this?
Don't be a dummy... This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.
Thanks for this kind of constructive feedback.
I'm fine with you NAKing all these patches based on who they are from.
Would you like to clarify such an information a bit more?
I mostly just delete these without responding because the guy has history of introducing bugs and never listens to feedback.
I admit that I'll stumble on programming mistakes again occasionally as another ordinary free software developer who is struggling various open issues.
I am listening to various feedback. My responses might not be pleasing enough for you. Are you looking for any special information to improve a corresponding discussion?
Regards, Markus