Hi,
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 09:20:30AM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le vendredi 09 septembre 2016 à 16:35 +0200, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 12:01:56AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com wrote:
The E231732 is a 7" panel with a resolution of 800x480.
From what I could make out of an archived version of Netron's website (it's unreachable from my place), they are a manufacturer of printed ribbon cables, not LCD panels. This is probably a no-go.
I don't know. I haven't been able to find any website for Netron DY, however, googling the part number I used find numerous matches on ebay and alibaba.
While starting a port for the A13-based TZX-Q8-713B7 tablet, it appears that my LCD cable also has the Netron-DY E231732 marking, but is definitely different from the one on the SinA33. So I think Chen-Yu's comment was founded and "Netron DY E231732" does not reflect the panel name.
Here are some details regarding the LCD cable on both devices:
The SinA33 has a 1024x600 panel with the following markings: 7300101463 E231732 NETRON-DY <> 1 94V-0\1310
The TZX-Q8-713B7 has a 800x480 panel with the following markings: 7300101448 E231732 NETRON-DY <> 2 94V-0\1249
So it seems that the distinctive part of the name is 7300101463/7300101448.
Also, it seems that various online shops list the panels with a name like "E231732 7300101463". So maybe we could change the bindings to have:
- netron-dy,e231732-7300101463
- netron-dy,e231732-7300101448
What do you think? Does that make sense?
We should probably also fallback netron-dy,e231732 to the sina33's panel in order to avoid breaking the ABI.
That's kind of unfortunate, and maybe the netron part is just the vendor of the flex cable.
In your case, I guess the best work around this would be to call it TZX-Q8-713B7-panel, if it's shipped with a single resolution.
Maxime