Hi Mark,
Am Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2017, 14:19:35 CEST schrieb Mark Yao:
Signed-off-by: Mark Yao mark.yao@rock-chips.com Acked-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org
Changes in v5:
- clean document commit title
- move changes description out of docummit commit msg
Changes in v2:
- rename rk322x to rk3228
- correct some vop registers define
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt index 9eb3f0a..5d835d9 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt @@ -8,8 +8,12 @@ Required properties:
- compatible: value should be one of the following "rockchip,rk3036-vop"; "rockchip,rk3288-vop";
"rockchip,rk3368-vop";"rockchip,rk3366-vop";"rockchip,rk3228-vop";"rockchip,rk3328-vop";
what is your ordering scheme here? As the number of rkXXXX socs will very likely increase in the future ordering alphanumerical might make everything more manageable when the list grows.
So maybe swap rk3368 and rk3366 and move rk3228+rk3328 to sorted positions?
Heiko