5 Apr
2018
5 Apr
'18
10:12 a.m.
On Wednesday, 2018-04-04 19:55:18 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 04:38:09PM +0100, Eric Engestrom wrote:
[...]
-with_omap = false -_omap = get_option('omap') -if _omap == 'true'
- if not with_atomics
- error('libdrm_omap requires atomics.')
- endif
- with_omap = true
+with_exynos = false +_exynos = get_option('exynos') +if _exynos == 'auto'
- with_exynos = true
+else
- with_exynos = _exynos == 'true'
endif
Looks like some patch rebasing went wrong with this one (it simplifies omap, but also adds some exynos stuff)?
Indeed, that's a complete rebase fail... Thanks for not letting me push this unaware :)
I'll send a v3 of 8-19 next week, after landing the first bits (1-7). I think I'll defer 20-23 to after everything else has landed.
-- Sebastian