On 16 November 2015 at 17:43, Russell King - ARM Linux linux@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux linux@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
Please sensibly wrap your messages. Your lines are longer than 80 characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply to your very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that kind of additional work? Thanks.
His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters. You should probably look into fixing your MUA.
No.
Standard net etiquette is that email should be wrapped around 72 characters to give space for reply indentation to remain readable on an 80 column screen. Most of my email replies are written on an 80 column screen.
Oh, I just thought there was a greater reason for your 660-character tantrum than someone overshooting by 14 characters on a couple of lines.
Then again, having read the rest of the pointlessly hostile mail, it's entirely in keeping with the rest.
Shame that your needless aggression obscures a fairly valid point.
Have a lovely even ing .