On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:05:39AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:10 AM Will Deacon will@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:32:54AM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
On 2020-11-24 00:52, Rob Clark wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:01 AM Sai Prakash Ranjan saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2020-11-23 20:51, Will Deacon wrote:
Modulo some minor comments I've made, this looks good to me. What is the plan for merging it? I can take the IOMMU parts, but patches 4-6 touch the MSM GPU driver and I'd like to avoid conflicts with that.
SMMU bits are pretty much independent and GPU relies on the domain attribute and the quirk exposed, so as long as SMMU changes go in first it should be good. Rob?
I suppose one option would be to split out the patch that adds the attribute into it's own patch, and merge that both thru drm and iommu?
Ok I can split out domain attr and quirk into its own patch if Will is fine with that approach.
Why don't I just queue the first two patches on their own branch and we both pull that?
Ok, that works for me. I normally base msm-next on -rc1 but I guess as long as we base the branch on the older or our two -next branches, that should work out nicely
Turns out we're getting a v10 of Sai's stuff, so I've asked him to split patch two up anyway. Then I'll make a branch based on -rc1 that we can both pull.
Will