On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 05:27, Jani Nikula jani.nikula@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Dave Airlie airlied@gmail.com wrote:
WTUF?
How did this ever land in my tree, there is no ACK on this from anyone in core dma-buf,
Intel team, clean your house up here, I'm going to have to ask you to stop Chris merging stuff without oversight, if this sort of thing happens, this is totally unacceptable.
There's no argument, an ack is required.
In fairness to the i915 maintainers, though, this particular commit was merged via drm-misc-next [1].
As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there are no such checks for drm-misc.
Sorry Jani, thanks for chasing that down.
drm-misc we need to oversight a bit more, I don't think we should be landing things that affect core code with single company acks.
Dave.