On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:23AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
Introduce a powerpc version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be used to replace the powerpc mem_encrypt_active() implementation, so the implementation will initially only support the PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT attribute.
Cc: Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: Paul Mackerras paulus@samba.org Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky thomas.lendacky@amd.com
arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig | 1 + 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ce55c2c7e534 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/*
- Protected Guest (and Host) Capability checks
- Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
- Author: Tom Lendacky thomas.lendacky@amd.com
- */
+#ifndef _POWERPC_PROTECTED_GUEST_H +#define _POWERPC_PROTECTED_GUEST_H
+#include <asm/svm.h>
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
Same thing here. Pls audit the whole set whether those __ASSEMBLY__ guards are really needed and remove them if not.
Thx.