14 Jun
2011
14 Jun
'11
4:14 a.m.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Dave Airlie airlied@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com wrote:
No need to assign the same copy callback for both copy blit and dma.
This used to confuse the benchmark code if memory serves, if thats fixed then I'm okay with this.
The benchmark code checks if the copy_dma function pointer is valid before attempting to use it.
Alex
Dave.