On 23 Dec 2014 00:27, "Bruno Prémont" bonbons@linux-vserver.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:46:48 -0500 Rob Clark wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Bruno Prémont wrote:
On !SMP systems spinlocks do not exist. Thus checking of they are active will always fail.
Use assert_spin_locked(lock); instead of BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(lock)); to not BUG() on all UP systems.
Signed-off-by: Bruno Prémont bonbons@linux-vserver.org
drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_irq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_irq.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_irq.c
index f035d2b..6ca9253 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_irq.c @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static void omap_irq_update(struct drm_device *dev) struct omap_drm_irq *irq; uint32_t irqmask = priv->vblank_mask;
BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&list_lock));
assert_spin_locked(&list_lock));btw, one too many ')' there... I've fixed up the same issue w/ msm patch as I applied it
Oops.
I got it right for the nouveau patch, so I was probably too quick doing the manual replace for the other occurrences in drivers/gpu/.
I didn't check how far back these BUG_ON() go though they might be worth applying to stable trees as well (could be the assert_spin_locked() macro appeared only after the introduction of some of these BUG_ON()s
though).
I've hit them on nouveau on 3.18 and 3.19-rc1.
I've taken the nouveau patch locally fwiw, and forwarded it on to Dave for - fixes.
Ben.
Bruno
BR, -R
list_for_each_entry(irq, &priv->irq_list, node) irqmask |= irq->irqmask;-- 1.8.1.5
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel