On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:43:14AM +0100, Robert Foss wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 23:25, Nicolas Boichat drinkcat@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:59 PM Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com wrote:
W dniu 04.02.2021 o 13:34, Nicolas Boichat pisze:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:07 PM Robert Foss robert.foss@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Xin,
Thanks for the patch.
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 12:17, Xin Ji xji@analogixsemi.com wrote:
Enable DSI EOTP feature for fixing some panel screen constance shift issue. Removing MIPI flag MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET to enable DSI EOTP.
Does "constance shift" have a typo? Should it be "constant shift"?
With that sorted out feel free to add my r-b. Reviewed-by: Robert Foss robert.foss@linaro.org
Hi Robert Foss, thanks, I'll correct it. Thanks, Xin
I don't think I quite understand how removing the MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET flag will cause DSI EOTP to be enabled. Could you extrapolate on this in the commit message?
That confused me as well, but it turns out that's how the flag is defined:
/* disable EoT packets in HS mode */ #define MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET BIT(9)(https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=5bd95ebd-044267fb-5bd8d5f2-0cc47a3003e...)
I'm almost tempted to put together a mass patch to rename all of these flags...
Yes that would be good, many of these flags were just copy pasted from some hw datasheet, without good analysis how to adapt them to the framework.
I'll look into it (but that shouldn't block this patch).
Thanks for clearing this up Nicolas & Andrzej!