Hi,
Le vendredi 09 septembre 2016 à 16:35 +0200, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 12:01:56AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com wrote:
The E231732 is a 7" panel with a resolution of 800x480.
From what I could make out of an archived version of Netron's website (it's unreachable from my place), they are a manufacturer of printed ribbon cables, not LCD panels. This is probably a no-go.
I don't know. I haven't been able to find any website for Netron DY, however, googling the part number I used find numerous matches on ebay and alibaba.
While starting a port for the A13-based TZX-Q8-713B7 tablet, it appears that my LCD cable also has the Netron-DY E231732 marking, but is definitely different from the one on the SinA33. So I think Chen-Yu's comment was founded and "Netron DY E231732" does not reflect the panel name.
Here are some details regarding the LCD cable on both devices:
The SinA33 has a 1024x600 panel with the following markings: 7300101463 E231732 NETRON-DY <> 1 94V-0\1310
The TZX-Q8-713B7 has a 800x480 panel with the following markings: 7300101448 E231732 NETRON-DY <> 2 94V-0\1249
So it seems that the distinctive part of the name is 7300101463/7300101448.
Also, it seems that various online shops list the panels with a name like "E231732 7300101463". So maybe we could change the bindings to have:
- netron-dy,e231732-7300101463 - netron-dy,e231732-7300101448
What do you think? Does that make sense?
We should probably also fallback netron-dy,e231732 to the sina33's panel in order to avoid breaking the ABI.
Cheers,