On Monday 18 October 2010 18:19:24 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Before we get into all these fringe drivers:
- I've not seen any progrss on ->get_sb BKL removal for a while
Not sure what you mean. Jan Blunck did the pushdown into get_sb last year, which is included into linux-next through my bkl/vfs tree. Subsequent patches remove it from most file systems along with the other BKL uses in them. If you like, I can post the series once more, but it has been posted a few times now.
- locks.c is probably a higher priorit, too.
As mentioned in the list, I expect the trivial final patch to be applied in 2.6.37-rc1 after Linus has pulled the trees that this depends on (bkl/vfs, nfs, nfsd, ceph), see below.
This is currently not in -next because of the prerequisites.
Arnd ---
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig index c386a9f..25ce2dc 100644 --- a/fs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/Kconfig @@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ endif # BLOCK config FILE_LOCKING bool "Enable POSIX file locking API" if EMBEDDED default y - select BKL help This option enables standard file locking support, required for filesystems like NFS and for the flock() system diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 8b2b6ad..02b6e0e 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ int lease_break_time = 45;
static LIST_HEAD(file_lock_list); static LIST_HEAD(blocked_list); +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(file_lock_lock);
/* * Protects the two list heads above, plus the inode->i_flock list @@ -149,13 +150,13 @@ static LIST_HEAD(blocked_list); */ void lock_flocks(void) { - lock_kernel(); + spin_lock(&file_lock_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_flocks);
void unlock_flocks(void) { - unlock_kernel(); + spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_flocks);