On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 05:55:12PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
Instead of plain error value (%d) print more user friendly error name (%pe).
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c index 18d52c39f0c2..8110586ce1fd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c @@ -580,8 +580,8 @@ int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
ret = ct_send(ct, action, len, response_buf, response_buf_size, &status); if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
CT_ERROR(ct, "Sending action %#x failed (err=%d status=%#X)\n",action[0], ret, status);
CT_ERROR(ct, "Sending action %#x failed (%pe) status=%#X\n",action[0], ERR_PTR(ret), status);
errname(), not this, with that:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
} else if (unlikely(ret)) { CT_DEBUG(ct, "send action %#x returned %d (%#x)\n", action[0], ret, ret); -- 2.25.1
Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx